EricHiggin said:
Yes but that's part of the problem is what I'm saying. For example, when much of the food industry offers high quality product to everyone equally, for a similar price, or everyone is taxed and that money fairly equally put towards everyone's high quality healthcare, when the internet is offered willy nilly it makes no sense. It should either be as equal as possible across the board, or free markets. Either that or regions should be able to have the power to make most of their own decisions and not rely on the Federal Government. Sure you can vote for a new Federal leader but to expect them to cover what's important in every smaller region is naive. Each region should be given funds to do what they wish, other than when it comes to large matters like a massive region spanning highway or something like that. I'd prefer free markets btw but that's just me. |
Free market is the only sensible solution =]
But yes, while it is mandated/coordinated by central power it should be without privileges, every action should as equally as possible benefits all and priorities should be on not leaving the bottom to far off from the middle.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."