GhaudePhaede010 said:
That is a silly argument. At no point did he say he was upset by it.
Also, if people are offended that (your example), especially Romans (or even Italians), then who would I be to tell them they are incorrect to be upset over something they feel misrepresents their culture or values? The bigger question would be, "should I be upset that people are upset over something that they find offensive" because not everything on Earth will offend me. But that does not mean other people that are offended should be ignored because I am not offended. |
Playing the "if people" offended is never going to work because there will always be people offended on either side. Some Native Americans are offended at the constant removal of their likeness from things such as this. You have to go more by a majority if anything, not just because 2% of people find something offensive we must appease them.
Also, do we have any evidence/proof that it was actual native americans being offended? Or was it some white guilt resetEra members trying to tell native americans they should be offended?
An Indian Head-dress/feather is not a misrepresentation any more than a Laurel wreath is for roman.
