By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SecondWar on 05 November 2018
Edit Thread
LivingMetal said:
SecondWar said:

There is a difference between false and unproven.

Similarly, I wonder how you'd feel if someone who had committed a serious crime against you was about to gain a significant position of power/success. You spoke out against them, and they dragged you through the mud, branded you a liar and got off scot free.

I would call that person out.  I would also recant my statement if there were contradicting evidence because I would never falsely accuse anyone of such wrong doing that would ruin his and his family's lives.  You do know that after the most recent FBI investigation, someone has come out to claim that is was possibly him who was with Dr. Ford and not Justice Kavanaugh, right?

Wait so, if a scenario where you know somone has committed a serious crime against you (I don't necessarily mean sexual assault), you would be more concerned about about ruining their life with your accusations. Doesn't matter if he is rapist/murderer/fraudster etc

I don't mean scenario where you think you know, I mean are certain it was them.

You also site a 'claim' that it was 'possibly' this other person in the alleged incident. How do you know that this person isn't making their story up for attention, like so many people say Dr Ford is?