By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.Peelman said:
taus90 said:
I dont know why Zelda is relevant the way Pubg and fortnite mobile are generating revenue on mobile devices, its just plain unfair to compare current mobile gaming scene to that of 3 year ago. more and more companies are focusing on gaming centric phones, PocoF1, Razer, even Samsung, google with their streaming services and when u see kids wasting money on stupid passes in Pubg and Fortnite just for cosmetic sake, so $1000 for a gaming phone which will play f2p games isnt a big deal.

Since I was the only one that mentioned it (as an example); it’s not on there, that’s the point. Neither are any other of my favorite games. It could have the power of the biggest supercomputer out there, then still even GameBoy would be better because it has one of my favorite games while a phone does not. Now I realize that the phone companies aren’t necessarily aiming at the established console gaming crowd, so I fail to understand why this comparison was necessary when it was probably better to compare it to another high end phone.

It makes me think the company believes it's market doesn't understand that the Switch is and never really was that powerful, so they feel the comparison will be apt for the target audience's mind. I don't even think the Switch was as powerful as most phones when it released. Already people (including me) were complaining that it wasn't a Tegra X2, for just one example. 

Edit: edited all this bullshit out ... holy shit ... they're supposedly the third biggest phone seller in the world just behind Samsung and Apple. I guess my random guess was right, they ARE a big chinese company!