Ganoncrotch said:
Surveys and statistics like this are often done with intention to prove a point before they begin, the information in op and the survey relates to people under 40 with no distinction as to what ages are and aren't covered. Having read the op and the linked newspaper I see the base age are omitted completely as such the survey wouldn't need to survey children in the age range that can't have sex it can simple include them in the people who aren't in that 0-40 bracket |
Really? While I'm no blind supporter of graphs or stats, because I know how one can easily manipulate the data or get different conclusions one the same data based on what they want, what is the benefit in this case?
We have for years been hearing how their birthrates have been declining. Falsifying this survey does what exactly?







