“It wouldn't be a problem if this was just a family story that she later found out was wrong. She didn't keep it just a story when she started labeling herself as a minority and was hired as Harvard's first woman of color.”
She was hired in 1995. The article that came out labeling her Harvard’s “woman of color” came out a year later. An article and label she distanced from and had no idea where it came from or why it came up. Multiple sources confirmed years ago her heritage had nothing to do with her career.
So essentially you’re using decades old article long since debunked to try and twist a situation into something it wasn’t. The very fact that she’d agree to take the DNA analysis and release the results should prove to any logical person that she wasn’t acting intentionally dishonest.
Try to make your own arguments, don’t parrot Fox News LOL.
