Torillian said:
Well if "innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply when jail time is not involved then what's the problem with the accusations? I don't recall jail time being on the table for Kavanaugh. Don't believe the hearing was "supreme court or prison". So you should have had no issue with Kavanaugh's name being dragged through the mud considering you want to do the same to Ford now. Also, I read through the thread, but how was I meant to realize that the person who quoted a response to your statement was actually trying to respond to the response of the further clarified intent of that quote? Don't see why you would assume that to be the case. Finally, this whole argument has been about how these kind of proceedings should have innocent until proven guilty regardless of whether or not there's a criminal proceeding, but now you hope that others get punished without giving them the same benefit of the doubt. Sounds pretty hypocritical to me. |
Again, where you to read the previous coments I said that I Ford would be off the hook, or more pressice, it would look bad to go after her. But feinstein is not. The entire point of it was that she had the letter since july. She decided not to come foward untill the last moment. Because of her the fbi did not have all the time to do the full investigations as democrats complain now. Feinstein and ford both claim that ford was meant to be keped off the public attention wich could have been done, had feinstein released the letter as soon as she got it and then ford would not have had to testify or even had her name exposed. While she denies it, EVIDENCE points to this being a political move.
So this time there is enough to discredit feinsteiin, while there was nothing at all to discredit kavanagh.
I dont really get what your trying to say in the middle section.
PS. have no idea how to spell anybodys name :P
It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.
