mrstickball on 21 June 2008
| colonelstubbs said: Considering the 360 is a slightly pimped up xbox, comments saying it usually takes 4-5 years to reach the peak of a consoles ability dont apply here. If you disagree, compare halo 2 with halo 3. Difference in graphics? Not really. Graphically geow2 looks fractionally better than geow1, so id say there isnt much more to pump out of the 360 |
Very funny. By that same regard, I think MGS4 looks only a little better than MGS3.
At any rate, I'd love to see a company make a AAA Xbox 360 game that used the same budget as MGS4. You know, 200+ developers, 4 years, $40m+ for 1 game.
The fact that it takes such a HUGE game to have PS3 fans start claiming superiority is staggering. Gears was made for about 1/4th the budget of MGS4, yet people are saying that MGS4 looks slightly better. Crazy that a $10m game that was made 1 and 1/2 years ago is being compared to a game that came out last week, and cost over $40m, no?
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
