OhNoYouDont said:
contestgamer said:
I'm not saying that "it doesnt matter". It does matter, and that's why she had the choice to prosecute or accept a payoff. I'm saying that an agreement was made to keep this between them and 400k was exchanged for that understanding. I dont see how you can just void agreements/contracts, because you no longer wish to be bound by them. That to me antithetical to our system of law. Agreements matter.
|
Obstruction of justice is also part of that system of law and such a contract would certainly fall under that...
|
It's obstruction of justice in California and a few other places. In most places it, is not. Regardless, they both agreed. It's a contract. It's providing justice according to the victim herself, hence why she would sign such a contract.