Bofferbrauer2 said:
This has one big flaw, though: What normal consumer actually buys a phone for the listed price? Almost no one, as everybody take them with their smartphone subscription. So even a 1000$ phone doesn't feel nearly that expensive in the end, even though the monthly subscription is a whooping 100$. If Nintendo would do the same as Smartphones, then gamers would only have to pay the symbolical 1$ upfront and pay 20$ per month for 2 years, after which you can choose yo keep it or continue to pay another 2 years for an upgraded Switch. In the end it would be much more to pay to Nintendo, but for consumers, since one doesn't pay a large sum at any point there, it just feels cheaper, not more expensive. |
Yeah also this, when people getting smartphones through subscriptions (and most people do that) they feel like getting phone almost for free, while they still need to play $300 for Switch and $60 for each game (at least when we talk about Nintendo games).