MontanaHatchet said:
Golvellius said:
Rock_on_2008 said:
starcraft said:
Username2324 said:
I would agree that GTA4 has lost alot of the fun and freedom of San Andreas. Still a good game though.
You know if GTA4 had remained a Playstation exclusive it could have tapped into the extra Blu-ray storage and had much more content, but MS likes to ruin everything. |
Thats like saying "if Sony had a better online service Rockstar could have expanded and enhanced multiplayer and DLC beyond two exclusive episodes, but Sony likes to ruin everything."
|
Your anti-Sony rhetoric annoys everyone. seriously if your 360 is so amazing go and play it.
BTW: You should be thanking Sony for bringing the great Final Fantasy games and Grand Theft Auto games to the world.
On topic both GTA: Sandreas and GTA IV are two excellent games in their own right. PS3 FTW.
|
Why should I thank Sony who neither created Final Fantasy nor GTA for stealing those games away from the Nintendo consoles and the PC?
FF belongs on Nintendo consoles, GTA belongs on the PC, in case you don't know.
|
.....What?
No series "belongs" on a console. Hell, we could all pester Microsoft for harboring several series that "belong" on Sega consoles. The Sonic series was far better when it was on the Sega consoles. The Grand Theft Auto series was crap on the PC. The top-down view was nearly impossible to play with, and the mission structure was primitive at best. And the 7th generation FFs as we know them today wouldn't be possible on the N64. Series usually end up going where the hardware best suits them or where they will sell the best. A series, if third party, doesn't "belong" anywhere.
|
I know that the term doesn't make sense. I just wanted to respond in the same tone of the post I was quoting. But your Sega argument doesn't count because that happened when Sega had already been put out of (hardware) business. But let's not argue about that since my first post was already off-topic.
