Runa216 said:
No, that's a poor analogy, the cost of the game doesn't automatically cover online costs and holy shit why am I arguing? You are wrong. And this isn't just about Nintendo. WoW costs monthly to play online. Xbox One costs money to play online. Final Fantasy XIV costs money to play online. PS4 costs money to play online. Nintendo's online cost is a fraction of any of those fees and you're still whining. It has little to do with 'Nintendo' as a whole, but it sounds like you're raging against the idea of online play and Nintendo happens to be the bitch du jour so you're arguing your points while pretending it's somehow Nintendo exclusive to act like you're on topic. If you don't like paying for online, that's fine. I'm not too fond of it either, but online gaming is a luxury. If you don't wanna pay for it, play on PC. Based on the numbers and how much money PSN/XBL makes from as many sources as it does proves that the service is a value and that it's worth it to many. You and others just have entitlement issues. |
Hmm, well then I can't understand why a consumer would defend anti-consumer practices, but it shouldn't be hard to understand the opposite. Naturally I don't like paying more for something I've already paid for. If that's a problem for you, welp too bad! Call it entitlement issues or whatever else, but it wont stop people from complaining about pay2play and Nintendo's lame offerings, and that's good, as doing otherwise wont make Nintendo improve.