By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
QUAKECore89 said:
So below 90 MC won't be a "must-play", i think this is risky as hell, i mean you know.. a pack of bad stuff messages.

Best of luck for reviewers and game developers.

What do you mean? Reviewers can get rich. This is a business opportunity if I ever saw one.

RolStoppable said:
OTBWY said:

Maybe they should add a "Rol doesn't agree." badge. Matter of fact, they should add a thumbs down option just for you to give out here.

I disagree with so many Metascores. It's really a shame that nowadays not even a 90+ score is a good indicator for whether or not a game is good.

I disagree with some. Xenoblade 2 is not a 83 imo. Should be higher. But I generally agree with most of it.

As far as Metacritic goes, or other aggregate sites, I think it is a good way to get a first quick impression and it does add some value. However, the best way of course is to listen to the people you trust the most. Be it a website, or blogger, Youtuber or whatever. It should be up to yourself to decide ultimately.