By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GOWTLOZ said:
DonFerrari said:

Sure there are people who obsess with details. But we do know that a lot of times this accusation is used even if a person like photo-realism or 4k instead of cartoon 720p... "gameplay is all that matters", "60fps or more" and other throw around.

The obsession with puddles or 710 vs 720p is usually people trolling games on the competitor platform.

And certainly graphics alone doesn't make a game, if the rest isn't up to par it will just be a boring or shitty 4k show.

I know what you're saying. I see games with good graphics like Sony games downplayed for having good graphics! Its hilarious. Its not as if a game with good graphics can't be a good game. I usually see this complaint from 2 fanbases, and its sad.

Well, that is normal from fanbase to detract or defend based on who is making =]



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."