JWeinCom said:
Most atheists I know, and pretty much all that I've seen in this topic, take atheist to simply mean not believing in a god. I would actually describe it as anyone who is not a theist. I would personally not consider babies, because I think for one to count they need to be capable of evaluating the idea. Otherwise we get to silly positions like a pig is an atheist. But the second point shows that you are misrepresenting (I'm assuming unintentionally) what people here mean by atheist. I would consider someone who says "I don't know" as an atheist. Because anyone who does not believe that god exists, whether they are certain or not, is not a theist. And would therefore have to be an atheist, as those two categories form a true dichotomy. To sum it up, everyone capable of understanding the concept of god has to be a theist or an atheist. If they're not a theist, they're an atheist. |
Not this again. Agnosticism is a legitimate position.







