Dota2Gamer said: I have not yet found a convincing counter-argument against the Moral Argument as a proof of God's existence. Granted, I admit I have my own bias since I'm a Christian. We have our own biases anyway but I'm open to hear some different opinions. How would Atheists in this forum counter the moral argument. And please, don't misrepresent the moral argument. I'm not saying that Atheists can not be moral. anyway, below is the argument:
(8)The fact that all humans agree on the concept of good and evil further justifies the bible's quote regarding God putting morality on our hearts, Romans 2:15. Because if we are just a natural and physical occurence, there is no right or wrong, there is only strong and weak. They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them. - Romans 2:15 |
(1) Do objective morals exist? There is no evidence that it does. Personally I don't believe in objective morality. You can have your premises, but there is no foundation for them.
(2) That's correct. There are people out there who are indeed doing this, because there is no one, which they think, who can stop them.
(3) And that's actually they case when you look at humanities past and present. Different cultures were created which different laws. How can that not be a part of subjective morality?
(4) It's one of these, both and neither depending on how you look at it. There is no moral ground on where you stand. Good and bad don't exist from a universal point of you. The universe doesn't care. Humans do. For some humans, Nazi's are consider bad and for others humans Nazi's are considered good. If humans would be objective moral and Nazism considered bad, there wouldn't be any Nazi's. If your counter-argument is, well, that's just wrong, than you committing an appeal to emotions which you actually do by your reasoning.
(5) And that's also going in the direction of an appeal to emotions. I don't believe in objective morality, nor free will, so how do I solve this issue? I can't call them evil, nor immoral. But I can call them a threat to society in which I live in. In order to grow and live peacefully, I cannot permit such actions. So I will condemn them on this basis alone.
(6) I don't see the problem by doing so.
(7) Example?
(8) You can't call that a fact if not all humans agree on it like you've already demonstrated in your own argument. You just shot your own argument.
Edit: Also, I see a far more bigger issues when Theists (Christians) argue for morality and their guiding book (Bible). It's really easy to throw the argument back at you. Just like that:
Does it mean that if you stop believing in God and the Bible that you will go out and rape / abuse children and kill people? Because, what's stopping you if God is not real, right?
If I go by Wikipedia, there are about 500 million atheists on this planet. Why aren't they killing each other? They don't believe in any scripts.
Last edited by Peh - on 06 September 2018Intel Core i7 8700K | 32 GB DDR 4 PC 3200 | ROG STRIX Z370-F Gaming | RTX 3090 FE| Crappy Monitor| HTC Vive Pro :3