By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
method114 said:

You don't see how it's unreasonable to ask developers to not only make great games but to move their genre forward in an important way? That's not only unreasonable it's impossible for any dev to do so consistently.

Not only does the quote have nothing do with consistency in regards to innovation (?), but just like everything relating to video game critique it is all about the degree and not the direct quote itself. I'm sure if the reviewer felt that this was the best superhero game ever made, and that it perfected the genre without being "revolutionary", he would have given a much higher score and his summary would be way different. However, because that is not how he feels, the lack of innovation sticks out even more. 

Honestly, this shouldn't even need explanation. How much people want out of a game is not just due to basic descriptors, but how well core elements are pulled off. If you would have read the entire review like I did, you'd see why it got that kind of criticism. 

If he took 5-15 points because of lack of pushing the genre in a meaningful way ok. And if he doesn't put issues or errors you could understand as "perfecting the genre" if you want.

 

But he took 30 points, that is exaggerated. Unless they usually take 30 on average just on that it already points a grave error on their score.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."