AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Do you believe that the inclusion of women in Battlefield 5 would be fine if the women were only present in regions where they actually fought? |
When looking at the trailer itself, I don't care for what they presented (though it was still a bit questionable as billing it as WW2, but whatever). But if you claim us to be uneducated for not believing it, then for sure it has to be the regions they did fought in, cause that's implying they no better than us about WW2.
I think it was more the Woman combined with prosthetic arm and cricket bat and on british front lines, than just the woman itself.
So to sum it up:
-If that interview didn't occur, than I don't care what wack ass scenario they show, it's not like battlefield was that realistic anyways.
-However if you you claim us to be uneducated for not believing this sort of thing happened, than it women only better be present in the regions they fought in. Obvious attempt at rewriting history to make it more diverse.
Though we've already agreed to disagree on this topic, so whatever.
Bet with Intrinsic:
The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.