HollyGamer said:
JWeinCom said:
The laws of physics are not created. There are descriptive laws and prescriptive laws. A prescriptive law is something like the speed limit that tells somewhat what you have to do. Then there are descriptive laws like the laws of physics. They're not laws that have to be enforced or obeyed. They're just our observations about how things act in the universe.
There's no one like creating those kinds of laws or enforcing them. Unless you think god is up there saying "hey you photon! You better not go more than 299,792 km per hour or your ass is spending the night in the slammer!"
|
Then tell me ( i bet you will not able to answer) why the law act like that , why the law of physicist are work the way they now. The atoms is don't have mind and even in the molecular and atomic level it's different then the physicist in the planetary level.
|
Of course, I can't answer that. And neither can you. You can claim to have an answer, but a claim requires justification, which I'm sure you won't be able to provide.
WolfpackN64 said:
Alara317 said:
Dude, give it up; you're so far out of your league it's actually depressing to watch you try.
Furthermore, you are misunderstanding the difference between an assertion of truth(Theism), and the critique of the lack of evidence to support that statement (Atheism.) Atheists aren't saying 'There is no god', they are stating that your claim of a god is unsubstantiated. In a rational world, the complete and utter lack of evidence supporting a God means that it really is kinda crazy to believe in God. The ONLY reason God is still such a powerful force in our culture is that such a concept is so ubiquitous and pervasive that it won't go away and that those who believe have specifically manufactured an entity that cannot be questioned.
Religion can be a force of good, but it is completely illogical to take any of it as sincere or actual truth. anyone looking to a holy book for anything other than a philosophy is doing it wrong.
|
It's funny to see you guys twist and turn and use concepts you all clearly don't grasp. But fine, clearly the academic has no idea what he's talking about.
|
Clearly he doesn't. Being an academic (I have a master's degree so I guess I'd qualify too) doesn't make you right. You've been saying things that are clearly and demonstrably false. And you are now engaging in another logical fallacy.
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/21/Appeal-to-Authority
You have already acknowledged that you can disbelieve in my unicorn without having to prove its nonexistence. And atheists disbelieve in your god on those same grounds.
Last edited by JWeinCom - on 04 September 2018
