By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I'm a Christian, proud to be and I always appreciate seeing questions like this. I always look forward in engaging with polite discussions with Atheists. Debate implies that I won't accept accept open ideas. I prefer the term discussion or polite disagreement.

Actually, believing in God is what makes the most sense. Since, it has been established in the second law of thermodynamics that something cannot be created out of nothing. For the premise of the law of thermodynamics to be true, one must accept that something has been created.

You may bring up the Big Bang or the concept of the initial singularity of all matter and energy, but a question will still arise, what caused the Big Bang, where did this singularity came from.

Whether you are an Atheist or a Christian, if you are honest with yourself, at the current state of Science, we still don't know anything. We will know it when we know it. But to reject the concept of a God when Science has not even proved or disproved His existence is a little bit irrational. At least Christians have their Faith as a basis, what do those Atheists have to back their rejection? An incomplete materialistic evidence that answers nothing?

Granted, it makes sense for Atheists to reject God if they make presumptions or define God on finite Humanistic knowledge. I can define God as a flying spaghetti monster so I can reject it and that's it. But it will be dishonest of me to do so since I am only misrepresenting bible's arguments to justify my rejection of my own concept of a Creator. Then, why would I suppose that this creator can only exist in the finite universe given that He is supposed to be infinite and not bound by time? As the String Theory suggests, a person living in a 2d universe cannot decipher the existence of a person living in a 3d universe, we humans, who are living in a 3d universe cannot decipher people from 4d universe assuming that there is a a 4d universe.