Eagle367 said:
You said why does the response have to be one God or causeless. Of course if you say you don't know, that already exists in agnosticism but then you have to decide something in how to live your life |
Atheism is what you believe about a god. Atheism means I don't believe this claim. Theism means you believe it.
Agnostic or gnostic refers to what you know or rather claim to know. So a gnostic atheist would be someone who claims "I know god does not exist". An gnostic theist would say "I know god exists". An agnostic atheist would say "I don't believe a god exists but I don't know that for a fact." And an agnostic theist would say "I believe a god exists, but I can't prove it."
That's how I'm using the terms, and how most atheists use it. I'm not going to argue over them, cause I find that boring, but just wanted to make sure we're on the same page. I don't mind being labeled as an agnostic, because that is technically accurate, but I tend to identify as an atheist, because I think my beliefs are closer to what most people think of when they think of atheism.
Back to the point, I don't know why I have to decide anything about the origins of the universe to live my life. It'd be cool to know, but however it began, I can observe the world around me that exists now, and decide how to live my life based on the current state of the universe. I can live just fine without knowing, or pretending to know, the origins of the universe.
