Egann said:
I would actually say the epistemic problems are more damning because they will cause moral problems given time, but if you want to focus on morality, so be it. I don't mean that morality cannot be exhibited in other places, but that these are spurious from a larger scale point of view. The moralities you can derive from atheism and agnosticism do not function to build societies with. Atheists in particular tend to be free with stealing morality ideas from theists because a few of the theistic morals work quite well. This can appear sensible to an individual, but the morality and the worldview have fundamentally different presuppositions about the universe behind them and one or the other will eventually get rejected. It's almost always morality which gets rejected, too. People don't like being told what not to do. And of course, the rejection process causes massive social upheaval and often death in the process. Accepting an idea your philosophy cannot actually support makes you morally culpable in what happens when it is inevitably rejected. |
Can you define morality?







