WolfpackN64 said:
I believe God exists (due to personal experience and the arguments I've researched). I believe there are good arguments for believing. But it would be presumtuous of me to claim I can at the same time disprove all atheistic arguments and do so decisively. I have an awnser for most of them, but to say I can fundamently destroy them? No. If I would make it my lives work, perhaps I could uproot one or two, but since I'm a more positively inclined person, I'd rather strengthen religious arguments instead. Since I also believe these arguments are not perfect (which does not mean they're false). |
You don't need to be able to disprove arguments. The person who is making an argument has to demonstrate it to be true. We don't just assume it's true until proven false.
For example, if I wanted to say that god doesn't exist, (a claim I would generally avoid making) it would be my job to prove it, or rather support it. If I can't adequately support it, it would not be justified to believe it, whether or not you could actually disprove it.
Likewise, if you want to claim that god exists, you would have to provide evidence for it to be justified. I may be unable to counter the arguments (especially because many of them are designed in such a way to be unfalsifiable), but that doesn't mean you are justified in believing it.
I'm also not quite sure what you mean by atheist arguments. The only real valid atheist argument I've heard is that theists have yet to provide a good reason to believe in a god.
