WolfpackN64 said:
That's just because of the nature of the argument. They're trying only to prove the existance of a God, not what the qualities of that God are. For that, Thomas Aquinas' arguments are of more use. |
But, they don't prove the existence of a god. Again, if you accept the premises, which I do not, they prove a cause. There is no real justification for calling that cause god.
If you have an argument that actually does prove god I'd be open to it. To my knowledge there has yet to be a sound one.
Also, if you're interested there's a good video of a PHD in philosophy discussing the Cosmological argument.