By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LuccaCardoso1 said:
WolfpackN64 said:

The problem is that the proof put forward (revelation) is never accepted. So the burden actually falls on both sides because they're equally inconclusive.

Well, revelations aren't actually proofs. I can write a book right now saying that I talked to a giant spaghetti monster and he told me everything about the world and convince 10 of my friends to do the same. Wouldn't make it proof that this monster actually exists.

True, but if thousand of people had revelations and attributed it to the same phenomena, then you must realize the revelations aren't so easily dismissed. That's why the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster utterly fails as religious sattire. A mock religion with no real foundation mocking religious institutes over 2000 years old with a long history of philosophical engagement and tradition. Just goes to show they just don't get religion at all.