By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WolfpackN64 said:
LuccaCardoso1 said:

I just want to point out 1 thing about this: Just because we have no proof that it didn't happen, it doesn't mean we should take the hypothesis seriously. The burden of proof is on the person hypothesizing.

The problem is that the proof put forward (revelation) is never accepted. So the burden actually falls on both sides because they're equally inconclusive.

Well, revelations aren't actually proofs. I can write a book right now saying that I talked to a giant spaghetti monster and he told me everything about the world and convince 10 of my friends to do the same. Wouldn't make it proof that this monster actually exists.