By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WolfpackN64 said:
Flilix said:

Why didn't he make a better world, that works well for everything and everyone?

This will always circle. The most good world would be an unfree world, the best world is a free world, but which incorporates a neutral world and the possibility of evil. There are other conceptual problems with an exclusively good world (like the possibility of good without evil). In Daoism for example, the most Good world just wouldn't be possible without the negative aspects.

You don't need to have an unfree world to don't have natural disasters. Natural disasters happen with or without humans and they have nothing to do with choice.



B O I