palou said:
It's one model, of many, which can't be verified in any way. Basing an argument on that seems a little dubious.
Regardless, I fail to see how one consequently would need to conclude in god. The strength of the model comes from the very fact that it creates no issues. Could you elaborate? |
In a chain of contingent beings (that can cause effects and have effects caused on them) there must be in the beginning a necessary being that can cause effects, but is not caused itself. Since the Big Bang is a contingent event, that would still not explain the universe. But this is and remains a metaphysical argument, not definitive proof of anything.
