By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WolfpackN64 said:
palou said:

No. That's a bit of a misconception. The current big bang theory does not comment on the origin of time. It assumes the existence of time at the event. 

 

The big bang is simply the limit of what we can describe; since no information preceding the event could physically be observed from our stand point. 

 

It's the beginning of the *observable universe*. We simply have 0 information (and know to have 0 information) of the universe outside of the observable universe (equivalently, in both time and space), by definition. 

It's not a misconception, It's a very plausable hypothesis even pushed by the late Stephen Hawking himself.

It's one model, of many, which can't be verified in any way. Basing an argument on that seems a little dubious. 

 

Specifically, I fail to see how one consequently would need to conclude in god. The strength of the model comes from the very fact that it creates no issues. Could you elaborate? 



Bet with PeH: 

I win if Arms sells over 700 000 units worldwide by the end of 2017.

Bet with WagnerPaiva:

 

I win if Emmanuel Macron wins the french presidential election May 7th 2017.