Fortnite Nintendo Switch (undocked), Galaxy S9+, iPhone X Graphics Comparison

[Trumpstyle]

Pemalite said:

Trumpstyle said:

The fortnite mobile version proves that mobile performance for gaming is greatly exaggerated.

Galaxy s9 officially has 350 gigaflops (exynos version), the snapdragon 845 has 737 gigaflops but this in fp16 so we need to halve it, then we get 368 gigaflops. We don't know the gigaflops number for the iphone 8/X as Apple won't reveal it. 

https://www.anandtech.com/show/13039/the-lg-g7-review/3

Here we go again.
Gigaflops isn't the be-all, end-all in regards to performance.
A GPU with less Gigaflops can beat a GPU with more Gigaflops.

Trumpstyle said:

According to anandtech, most phones GPU loses between 50-20% performance when pushed to the max (in the manhattan 3.1 offscreen test). But this is only when pushing the gpu to the max, what happens when a game pushes the CPU and GPU to the max at the same time? We get performance worse than Switch console in undocked mode.

Switch has 150 gigaflops when undocked.

So 13 years later Nintendo switch(undocked) and top smartphones still can't beat Xbox 360, that console have 240 gigaflops :)

https://www.anandtech.com/show/13039/the-lg-g7-review/3

The newer the GPU, generally the more efficient it is and the more powerful it is.

Top Smartphones and the Switch are most certainly superior to the Xbox 360 in every scenario that actually matters.

 

Dude we don't haft to disagree with everything, you can give me compliments from time to time. I know Flops isn't everything, as we can see comparing Nvidia and AMD Gpus. Nvidia Flops is usually 30% faster. And I agree somewhat with your respond, except Xbox 360 is probably more powerful than than switch undocked or the most powerful smartphones when fully used.

We can see this in digital foundry comparison of LA noire where ps3 beats switch undocked both in graphics and performance, this despite switch having 4gb RAM.