Azzanation said:
Can you provide links to your post to prove what you are claiming? If not than its nothing more than an assumption on your part.
I agree on one part, i spent more effort in my post than i needed. It seems i need to explain and educate people. Companies close studios down, its not rocket science, its how the world works. Underpreform or lose too much money than expect a mother company to investigate and make an move. Whats being said does not relate to a company buying another company unless you are 100% sure that Obsidian is going to close there doors under MS, without proof than its an assumption. I proved it doesnt always happen, hence why i brought up Rare. You have no excuse for Rare except (there lucky, its PR Bullsh%#, its the image) nonesense which is not factual but just an assumption on your part. Weather you like the idea of Obsidian being brought doesnt suprise me. If you have a vendetta agasint MS than maybe someone should write a thread about this behaviour you speak of. This is all a rumour so lets not take this for granted. |
Your own posts are the source.
You are the one claiming how all those studios were bad and making consecutive blunders but good MS tried their best to help out until the most humane thing was to close them down. Never MS mistakes, it was the choice of those studios that had worked for decades that suddenly decided to do bad games.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."