Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[JEMC]

Chazore said:

JEMC said:

In my opinion, the best case is a middle one, and that's having all the games on as many clients possible.

That would allow us to enjoy all (or most) of our games within one store, while also encouraging the competition between stores to gives us a better client and deals.

It would make sense, but it doesn't to the rest of said competition. Even Ubisoft, who does sell their games on Steam, demands you use their client at the end of the day, which shows that they want their cake and to eat it too, while I get zero choice in the matter, because buying it on Steam requires me to install and use Uplay, and ofc the other option is to install and use Uplay, so I'm out of actual options I want in that scenario. 

I made that thread recently, to show that the competition doesn't care about us, they don't care about our convenience. They just care about not paying someone else money.

You're talking like Steam were some kind of NGO when it's actually the same as the rest, only with a bigger marketshare. I don't recall seeing any Valve games on any of the other platforms. Maybe it's because they don't want to share their money with them either?

Valve/Steam is no saint, it only lanched first and became the biggest one, making it look better.

And Ubi wants you to use their own client, so what? Install it, use it only when you want to play some Ubi games you bought from wherever you wanted, and then close it. It's simple as that. Or are you going to tell me that your SSD/HDD doesn't have room for it? And the same goes with EA, which I'm surprised you don't use as an example as they're worse than Ubi, but since they make so little interesting games it's not a real problem.