By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Immersiveunreality said:
SuaveSocialist said:

1. You are asking me why NYCrisis corrected melbye's error.  I ask why you raise this question to me instead of NYCrisis.  I ask you where NYCrisis said anything about what's acceptable.  

2. Only when you provide rational answers to my questions will you have the privilige of discussing logic/illogic with me.

1.Because you defended him without seemingly knowing motives.

2.You did not ask questions 

1. So you are asking me why NYCrisis chose to correct melbye's error...because I didn't know what motivated NYCrisis when he chose to correct melbye's error.  I'm not even going to dignify that with an answer.

I note that you did not point out where NYCrisis mentioned anything about what's acceptable.

2. My questions were in my previous reply and you failed to answer either of them rationally.