Chazore said:
It does by voting. If we have the smaller numbers, the smaller votes aren't suddenly going to dwarf the larger ones. Yes, they can totally stay "£consistent", but that at the end of the day means nothing if that consistency lands them at the small side of the pond for years and years. I know that tactic, and I'm honestly not going for it . I don't vote because I know the numbers game on here. Me voting does nothing to sway anything and it wouldn't make any substantial increase nor "improve" or make things look "better" than they currently are. I guess it's easier to jab than it actually is to accept the smaller numbers . I've already accepted it, and yes I do love to point it out, because I can do that. Mentioning other groups having smaller votes at one time doesn't really do anything either, considering that they dwarf your own group, so there is that as well. |
With the amount of work that goes in those replies to JEMC, you could have voted 5 times
Signature goes here!