By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bofferbrauer2 said:
numberwang said:

The Chinese military for example has about twice active personnel compared to the US (2.2M vs 1.3M ) which is obscured by exchange rate magic comparisons.

Flag Country Active military Reserve military Paramilitary Total Per 1000 capita
(total)
Per 1000 capita
(active)
China[34] 2,183,000 510,000 660,000 3,353,000 2.4 1.6
India[71] 1,395,100 2,142,800 1,403,700 4,941,600 3.9 1.1
United States[166] 1,347,300 865,050 14,850 2,227,200 6.9 4.2
North Korea[115][Note 9] 1,190,000 6,300,000 189,000 7,679,000 305.7 47.4
Russia[131][Note 11] 1,013,000 2,500,000 710,000 4,223,000 29.7 7.1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_military_and_paramilitary_personnel

The US would also outspend most following countries combined in social spending if you take a total Dollars exchange rate as a base of comparison.

China has more soldiers, so what? China has 4 times more population, is a bigger country and the one with the most neighboring countries (14, not counting any close countries across the sea). So it's only natural that the country has a larger military as it has more space to cover. India has a bigger army mostly because of it's huge population.

I didn't expect North Korean Army to be this big. Sitting between China, Russia and South Korea, I expected a very large one, but that's ludicrous in size

How comes these countries have bigger militaries if the US outspends everybody else by so much? It's a fake statistic equating Rubel/Yuan oranges to Dollar apples.