SpokenTruth said:
So you haven't read them and yet are making claims about what's in them? And I know you haven't read them because they are still heavily redacted. 412 pages of warrant applications (4 or 5 warrants total) and they are heavily redacted. I know you don't like CNN but go to this link below. It has all 412 pages in an inline document viewer. There are 3 tabs at the top - Document, Pages and Text. Click Pages and scroll though to see just how much is redacted. 75% is still redacted. How can you say the Steele dossier makes up the bulk of the provided evidence when most of the evidence within 412 pages is redacted? Also, check page 15. Notice how information on Source #1, Steele, is also heavily redacted. Those who have seen the unredacted applications say that is where the Fusion GPS and opposition funding statements are. So the FISA court wasn't lied to, we just can't read the unredacted segments yet. https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/22/politics/read-carter-page-fisa-documents/index.html |
If they are not public yet then my mistake. They are not my claims, the house intelligence committee has seen the applications without redactions or at least know what’s in them. They are the ones that have claimed yahoo news articles as evidence. Trump should declassify them, I thought that’s what happened recently I guess not. I’m just going by what I heard and the source is as credible as anything you can bring. If they were not lied to then they are crooked, period.