Azzanation said:
1st part of your post, Or.. it might show that maybe this game made this feature (GamePass) successful. Which one is it to you?
2nd part of your post, No its not. This is related to SoTs and its player count. I am staying on topic with this. (No one in this thread or in other threads stated that the X1 is more successful than the Switch or PS4.) That doesnt make something a failure either. |
Gamepass already existed before SoT so SoT having good numbers because of it (and we can't even pin point how many just signed in the month for any reason, played the game and left) doesn't mean SoT is the cause. But we do know you have issues with cause and consequence.
I guess there are people still waiting for your reply on the MS FY thread.
You did. When you pointed that success was subscription and that MS with less than half HW sold had about equal subs to PS+ (but you sure never got over the fact that their subs were gold+silver+ms+switch minecraft).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







