albionus said:
Saying the failure rate was 3 % then 3-5% when they know it's much higher is lying. Repeatedly saying that the failure rate was normal when it clearly isn't is lying. I could go on but it's basically in the same vein as that so no reason to. While it's good they finally did the right thing there is a diminishing return to it's impact (or should be). I'll use a couple comparisons to illustrate what I mean. It's good when a criminal fesses up to a crime to the police. However, how that is received depends on whether the criminal came forward on his own, and whether he tried to lie to cops for a time. A criminal who has to be caught, and then lies is going to find a much harsher deal than one who turns himself in and tells the truth from the get go. |
I think you make a good point about the lying. Disingenuous, at best.
However, I still disagree that they had to come out and confess, and I think this is the focal point of disagreement. There was certainly a lot of pressure to do something about this, but there has been pressure for some time, and that pressure has simply been increasing. It's a matter of degree, and nothing has really changed. Six months ago, there was some pressure, three months ago, more, and today, even more than that.
But again, that's simply a difference of degree, not a fundamental shift. Microsoft managed to keep lying even in the face of a lot of pressure -- there isn't any obvious reason why they couldn't keep lying under a whole lot of pressure.
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">







