Aeolus451 said:
I provided a source while the other guy or you haven't provided anything. If you want to use "lack of statistics" or " that's just anecdotes " to disparage my argument when I used a source perhaps both of you should start with your own arguments first. I said over and over that a person's attractiveness (and lack of) can affect their personality development in both positive and negative ways. "The prettiest girls generally don't have the best personalities" Let's be clear, this is in reference to very attractive women. I'm not talking in absolute certainties but in likelihoods or odds. Aren't you capable of inductive reasoning? https://www.instagram.com/p/Bk5jZvLlyF_/?taken-by=iamyanetgarcia https://www.instagram.com/p/BV0oGbYDNpk/?taken-by=iamyanetgarcia https://www.instagram.com/p/Bkd-T-elEL0/?taken-by=iamyanetgarcia What are the odds that she's a down-to-earth, humble, funny, friendly woman that's willing to pay dutch on dates?
|
Doesn't matter what source you provide, if you are saying "The prettiest girls generally don't have the best personalities", that's a subjective statement that can't be quantified. I said I agreed that looks can affect personalities (both ways of course), but generalizing with a statement that is opinion is not scientific.
You can say girls that are rated attractive are less likely to pay on a date or girls that are attractive are more likely to reject a less attractive guy, because those are things you can measure. However, claiming that some group is more likely to have a better personality is strictly subjective, because what a person considers to be a good personality is different for many.