By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q on 27 July 2018
Edit Thread
SpokenTruth said:
o_O.Q said:

"Do we not see the slippery slope we are peering over right now?  You have your skis on and are ready to go. Shall we back away from the ledge?"

1). with regards to what? i mean i understand that because of the media you are under the impression that america is under the grip of a fascist totalitarian regime, but that's not reality... so... what do you expect me to say?

2). i called your post slanderous btw because you associated me with the right when really i am a classical liberal

"How does supporting not banning of a news reporter equate to supporting being able to invade a home for information?"

3). the president is able to have boundaries with regards to the press within reason

4). lets say obama was still president, would you be saying the same thing if alex jones demanded an interview?

1). You talk of me being slanderous and then you slander?

2). Slander requires that I specify someone and that it damages their reputation. I did not say o_O.Q is a member of the right wing nor do my posts here have any bearing on your reputation.

3). That doesn't answer my question.  How does supporting not banning of a news reporter equate to supporting being able to invade a home for information?

4). Alex Jones does not have White House or Congressional media credentials. And demanding an interview is not the same thing as covering a press conference.

"1). You talk of me being slanderous and then you slander?"

misinterpretations happen when you are needlessly vague

""Do we not see the slippery slope we are peering over right now?  You have your skis on and are ready to go. Shall we back away from the ledge?""

you haven't explained what you are referring to here... and given the context my interpretation was accurate imo

 

"I did not say o_O.Q is a member of the right wing nor do my posts here have any bearing on your reputation."

"the right went nuts about it.  Here, you guys"

how is this not associating me with the right?

 

"That doesn't answer my question.  How does supporting not banning of a news reporter equate to supporting being able to invade a home for information?"

it shows a clear disregard for boundaries

i used the privacy of the home as a metaphor

 

"Alex Jones does not have White House or Congressional media credentials"

actually he does : https://www.businessinsider.com/infowars-granted-white-house-press-credentials-2017-5

he's more deserving of them when compared to CNN and that's saying something