SpokenTruth said:
DarthMetalliCube said:
Ahh.. So I guess THIS is now the issue everyone's gonna blow completely out of proportion and lose their shit over, until next week when Trump sneezes on a foreign leader, then everyone will completely forget about this and rant about that, claiming it to be the Apocalypse or the second coming of Hitler. Remember that children in cages thing? The Putin thing? Seems like ages ago already, doesn't it? That's because everybody already forgot about it and moved on to the next thing, essentially - what the media instructs everyone to focus on and be mad at now..
Just so damn sick of the Trump hysteria, day after day, week after freaking week, and every week it's something else. I think I might have to filter out political threads here. I get enough Trump hysteria and propaganda shoved down my throat on practically a daily basis as is. I kinda come here to escape that crap..
|
Then.....why do you open the threads and read them? Do you read every single thread?
o_O.Q said:
"the right went nuts about it. Here, you guys"
you should be banned for this slanderous bullshit but regardless
|
Do we not see the slippery slope we are peering over right now? You have your skis on and are ready to go. Shall we back away from the ledge?
o_O.Q said:
a free press does not mean that they have free reign to go anywhere they want.... if i accused you of being a russian spy, does that give the press the right to invade your home to gather evidence?
|
How did you even get to this conclusion? How does supporting not banning of a news reporter equate to supporting being able to invade a home for information?
|
"Do we not see the slippery slope we are peering over right now? You have your skis on and are ready to go. Shall we back away from the ledge?"
with regards to what? i mean i understand that because of the media you are under the impression that america is under the grip of a fascist totalitarian regime, but that's not reality... so... what do you expect me to say?
i called your post slanderous btw because you associated me with the right when really i am a classical liberal
"How does supporting not banning of a news reporter equate to supporting being able to invade a home for information?"
the president is able to have boundaries with regards to the press within reason
lets say obama was still president, would you be saying the same thing if alex jones demanded an interview?
