gameplayer was@Too Human event lastnight(Too Human might turn out like Haze

[makingmusic476]

starcraft said:

SpartanFX said:

@starcraft

HAZE part is also the article's title,,,not my opinion,,

To EVERY one:

I haven't played the game ,and nothing is my impression,,it's just rewording of the article,,,,If I were to cherry pick would I mention one of the previewers that liked it?

No, the Haze part was your opinion.  The article ASKED if Too Human would be the 360's Haze.  It then proceeded to list one reviewer who liked the game, one reviewer who leaned towards liking it, and one who didnt like it.  ALL THREE said that they didn't have enough time with the game to examine its RPG, skill-tree or story elements, which ALL THREE noted would be important. 

You didn't reword the article with your thread title and OP, you REWROTE the article with your thread title and OP.

 

How is saying, "Too Human might turn out like Haze" any different than saying "Will Too Human turn out like Haze?"

And the mixed reactions in the article only back up his statement in the thread title.  Remember, Haze recieved 6-7s from most reviewers, which generally means it's okay, just not great.

And why is it that you bring up Lair in every Killzone 2 thread when just about every preview of the game has been positive, and the only complaints thus far have been "It's similar to other shooters" and "The AI needs some work"?  Impressions for Killzone 2 have been very positive so far, but you never give it the same optimism that you're giving Too Human.