dx11332sega said: Edit:Nevermind I should of read same gen . this is all i can think?
|
I didn't play much Super Mario at NES to remember fast about these. But yes that is quite the jump.
Cerebralbore101 said:
Dear God, OP's images are exactly why don't really care for graphics improvements from one gen to the next. The FF9 character is hilariously overtextured for the polygon level. It looks awful next to the simplified Cloud. Too often developers simply try too hard to get as realistic as possible, and the end result is this look that does not age well at all. Super Mario World looks miles better than UMK3. Fable 2 looks better than Oblivion. Disgaea looks better than PS2's Socom games.
Yeah, you win the thread. |
You are quite vocal... but to say Zidane looks awful next to that ugly Cloud is hilarious for me. But I do smell a big preference for cartoon graphics over photorealism.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."