By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bofferbrauer2 said:
*snip*
caffeinade said:

15%, that hurts.
It better be very cheap if they want to sell their cards at that level of performance.

I'd like to see how 7nm Vega performs in games though.
That'd probably be a pretty decent product.
With a 4096-bit memory bus and a new process node, it should be able to overcome the problems its predecessors faced.

Well the RX 680 would be a refresh of a refresh, as such 15% ain't that bad.

However, really wish Navi would come soon. Probably struggling to get the PC version running as expected. After all, PC games need a monolithic GPU, as they consider a setup like Epyc or Threadripper a Multi-GPU setup. So they possibly had to reconsider late into development and create multiple mask sets instead of just one

I didn't post the new about the Intel CEO because it wasn't "hardware related".

As for the AMD new mobile chips, it doesn't really affects us much as few people here game on a laptop, at least as far as I know. I'm more interested in the new 4-core Ryzen desktop chips.

And regarding the GPUs, maybe AMD should reconsider the way they develop GPUs and go back to a single, scalable architecture, and forget to develop two archs for the mainstream and high-end market. It saddens me to say this, but they seem to lack the resources to do it.

VGPolyglot said:
I wonder if PUBG will ever get a retail release on PC, if it does I may end up getting it to try it out.

A physical launch won't do much for them, specially with stores having less and less space for PC games.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.