By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Snoopy said:
Smartie900 said:

Bill Maher isn't leftist. He believes that Islam is of a lesser moral standard than other religions due to 9/11. He owns guns and believes they're necessary for proper defense. He's more sympathetic to Israel compared to Palestine. Bill Maher just says whatever is on his mind and hates the presence of political correctness. Don't use the stupid shit said by one kook to generalize an entire political stance. It's about as dumb as me trying to paint conservatives as intolerant, racist bigots because Roseanne said some racist stuff in a tweet one time.

Bill Maher is part of the Democratic party and most of his ideology is liberal if not all. Second, he isn't the only one. A simple google search shows a lot of people that are liberal want bad things to happen to get rid of Trump and Republicans. For example, a lot of them want open borders in order to get more democratic voters. Even though they know it will result in innocent American lives getting ruined by drugs, murderers, and gangs. This isn't some gray area policy, it's ILLEGAL and morally wrong on so many fronts.

You have democratic leaders like Nancy Pelosi trying to defend MS-13 (fucked up, to say the least). It would be one thing if it was a few liberals or small group compared to the whole, but it's not at all. Just like how some people think BLM group don't hate cops even though when they have their rallies a lot of them will chant "we want dead cops" with pretty much no one to stop them in their group.

I can agree with you on the fact that the Democratic party is corrupt and cares more about their own political interests rather than the well being of their own citizens. However, that results more from the broken nature of the 2 party system rather than actual beliefs or ability to compromise. Due to the Democratic and Republican parties being the only 2 that are relevant in the American political atmosphere, they're compelled to be contrarians and to do the exact opposite of the opposing party in order to justify their own existence. I see no sense in the Republican administration demanding less regulations in regards to the Clean Water Act rather than to oppose the stance of Democrats who support the act. I see no sense in Democrats defending a toxic, brutal gang like MS-13 rather than to oppose Republicans who despise them. My issue on this matter comes down to equivocation of 'Democrat' to liberal beliefs and "Republican" to conservative beliefs. That's what they're meant to stand for, but that concept does not apply well to reality. These 2 parties don't represent the demands of common American citizens and only support them through reference. Using the actions of high ranking individuals in 2 scummy parties to categorize the beliefs that a person may lean towards is about as infuriating as foreigners assuming that all Americans are war mongering assholes that want the rest of the world to burn to ashes because of the actions of our manipulative government. I may have been to quick to attack your statement and I apologize if I came off as standoffish, but I hate discrediting entire groups of people based off of their individual life experiences and genuine beliefs that aren't motivated by a political agenda.