SpokenTruth said:
1. We are not primal instinct functioning animals. We have long since evolved past that stage...well, most of us. 2. Shy men /= incel terrorists. 3. You would prefer a hyper-masculine son or son-on-law over a calm, mild mannered one? The former would be more likely to assault your daughter. |
If you truly believe that then by all means continue living in a make believe world. However reality does not care how you feel or what your opinions are. The fact is that beta males, incels or whatever you call these impotent waste of genes are not desirable to the vast majority of women. They are not desirable to the parents of women. They aren't even desirable to women who claim to only want those type of men. Nature has a wonderful system of making sure those genes get filtered out as best as possible from going into another generation, it's called the law of attraction.
Shy men are terrorist? From what we see the vast majority of men who commit acts of terrorist style violence are social outcast or have problems with women. It's a commonality that cannot be overlooked. That is what is so wrong with this aggressive feminist movement to eradicate masculinity from society, they are going to artificially create more incels by telling men that how you feel, how you behave, how you think is all wrong and you should conform to some bull hair cut feminist gender studies major of how society should be. Screw that.
Also further proof even women don't want that is that is how not even the majority of women consider themselves feminist, actually almost as much as call themselves that find the phrase insulting-which they are completely right in that opinion. They want Men, not men. They want someone to feel confident about, someone to take pride in; not some pajama poster boy sipping hot chocolate talking about health insurance who wouldn't even change his oil on his car.
Why would I prefer a "hyper masculine son or son in law over a mild mannered" one? One because you think they're only two levels to men tells me you lean closer to one side of this than the other. It's because I would feel confident in his decision making ability and actions. I would have peace of mind knowing my girls have a strong partner who isn't going to flake when things get difficult and is strong enough to stand up for them and keep that family safe. Why would I want a bitch as a son or a son in law? Why would I want one who couldn't defend himself, couldn't stay in an argument while keeping his cool,couldn't make a decision to save his life so he spends all his energy complaining about opportunities past? Christ on a cheesecake I could go on and on to why I wouldn't want my daughters to settle for a beta. Same goes for not wanting my son to be a beta. It's disgusting even thinking about it.
The age of the internet allowed betas to believe they have strength and courage. From twitter to facebook these keyboard warriors don't have to look someone in the eye (they can't do it anyway in person) and discuss different opinions so they can spew their anger and envy for everything everyone else has that they'll never acquire. However for a few of them that's not enough. Like the beta males who fill groups like Antifa to Stormfront they resort to violence because they're incapable of acting like a normal human being so they have to resort to violence.
