By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Podings said:
DonFerrari said: 

You contradict yourself when you in one post say he is acting entitled for complaining, and here say he have the option to complain louder than activists.

How is that contradictory? He DOES have that option. But utilizing it IS acting entitled. I'm not saying he isn't allowed to act entitled, but he might want to consider whether he wants to call it out as a problem that others do so, if this is the path he decides to follow.
You can't say at the same time someone have the right to do something, but that acting on that right is entitlement. 

DonFerrari said: 

Calling someone entitled is what?

Pointing out that someone expresses themselves in an entitled manner is not name-calling. I'm not even sure how I'd fashion that accusation into a namecall.  "You entitled little bitch!" would be a brash namecall, but even then, "bitch" would be the name.

Because you aren't discussing his point or the merit of his point, but that he is entitled because he is saying it. And people in VGC seem to have an issue separating action and person, someone that acts that way is implicit that. How often do you accuse smart people of acting dumb? Acting dumb is the action of dumb people for example.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."