By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation said:
DonFerrari said: 

That may be the reason why were are still seeing plenty of X360 games being released, would they ignore a 90M userbase right?

Oh Don, like usual the point has gotten way over your head. 360 is not the same architecture as the X1 and PC (You knew that right?), as you could see the 360 still managed to run games like Tomb Raider fine on its inferior hardware however its different architecture makes things very difficult to port games and scale games across. Its a lot easier to port a game to PC and X1 and all they really have to do for the X is downscale it like how most PC games have extremely low settings for gamers with inferior PCs. Its really not that hard to understand, than again this is the forums.

And you acting superior... Will CGI have to call you again?

Yes X360 and PS3 were able to handle PORTS because devs done it. PS2 could run Fifa 14, and if dev wanted they could make Fifa 18 on PS2.

Still show you that the fact that console sold 10M isn't guarantee that they will keep supporting it (160M PS2 were dropped as well), it doesn't have to do only with similar architeture. MS talk about being generationless and X1X keeping support for next gen is same as X1 (unless you want MS to go back on their promise that X1 and X1X will have same games) cross-gen will go there as it have always been, but your premise is that they will keep getting on X1X even after crossgen is no more, for which you have no evidence.

But I sure love all your technical knowledge, which you have shown plenty on this thread, and the slider to downscale games will solve everything very easy and fine.

Soundwave said:
Julianpd83 said:

It's funny how sony  can announce the playstation 4 is at the end of its life cycle and everyone praises them for getting ready but when Microsoft does it you guys spell doom hypocrisy at its finest

Yep, no one freaked out when PS4 Pro was announced and everyone is cheering for PS5 news but heaven forbid if MS dares to whisper about a new console. XBox One X is the best traditional home console hardware by a good margin, there's a good chance IMO that Scarlet will be better hardware than the PS5. MS has realized they need to have the best hardware. 

PS4Pro launched 4 years after PS4 and who are this everyone cheering for PS5 if in all threads on subject most Sony fans are saying 2020 at earliest? Besides MS is doing it 8m after releasing X1X not 48.

MS thought they had the best HW on X1 until they discovered they didn't. So why do you think MS will have the best one next gen unless they launch at least 12m after PS5?

LudicrousSpeed said:
lol, all the cross gen games we saw at the start of this gen and suddenly devs are gonna just ignore the Scorpio. Are they gonna ignore the PS4, too? Because if they’re making a PS4 version of these games why would they not make an Xbox version.

Per usual Papa Phil playing checkers and then people use his words to try and play chess. Also what’s this streaming talk? He’s on record saying he doesn’t agree with what the Ubi guy said.

People aren't talking about cross gen, but nextgen only, go see your buddy Azzanation trying to defend that X1 will keep getting games besides crossgen point.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."