Azzanation said:
That's where I see the next Xbox being marketed very differently compared to Sony's PS5. If MS go the PC no Gen route than its very possible to make the next Xbox very powerful but still being able to keep the other X1s as cheap alternatives. Yes they will struggle without a doubt but price wise not everyone will want to upgrade straight away. Tomb Raider 2013 and Forza Horizon 2 came out on the 360 so I see a similar method being applied to there next system without actually having to heavily code the games to run on the platforms. Its all just a possibility not a reality. PC do it, I cant see why consoles cant.
You are right, I misread the specs on that card. either way it was a very weak card with not enough Ram to keep up with Doom. I still managed to play it at 1080p and it held a solid 30 frames most of the time but when the effects started to jump in, my card started to show its age and I was playing it on Low/Medium settings. There were times I walked in a room and the card didn't even draw up the walls and it had this bright pink flat shaded look, it wasn't a good look for a game like Doom haha. |
Sorry but no... a console with the specs of X1X could possibly be an entry level for cheap price next gen, but the solution MS gone for X1X won't ever be a cheap console as much as PS3 couldn't ever really go 99 USD as did PS1 and PS2. It can't be made cheap enough in 2 years to be a 199 console versus PS5 and Nextbox.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







