Teeqoz said:
Saying that you are being short sighted is not name calling. I didn't make any condemnation about your personality - I merely pointed out that you were thinking in the short term on this particular issue. Microsoft's first party games have been releasing on PC for several years, and the Xbox One is still selling, so I think they'll be fine. Let's be honest - the Xbox One's slow-ish sales have little to do with Microsoft's 1st party games being avaliable on PC. |
Since when name calling and ad homine restricts to personality?
You assumed shot term thinking and adjectified that.
Xbox is still selling, not great. And they keep it selling, which shows they still need the consoles, which contradicts your own claim of seeing short term.
Haven't said Xbox slow sales have to do with their games being available in PC (although you can't prove the opposite, as you said "have little to do"). I said that they will keep needing consoles sales to get royalties on their games because so far they won't get much royalties from 3rd parties on PC.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."